Over the past 100 years the average global temperature has risen less than one (1) degree, possibly .6 of a degree.  In one  year the average global temperature has cooled approximately one degree. Thus one year has effectively erased 100 years of global warming. An inconvenient fact?

The collective man-made global C02 emissions is less than one half of one percent.  What about the other non-man-made 99.5 per cent? Government is supposed to supply the remedy and the money to fix things, right? (BTW, who really pays?) Please explain, maybe I missed it. Has the government ever addressed how we are to deal with the non-man-made C02 emissions?  And when I hear this “we can make a difference” song and dance: Is the suggestion that we can actually change things from approximately .5per cent to .4 or .3 per cent? And is this really possible given the China-India industrial explosion? Anyone know? Kindly explain the facts in lay terms.

If true science by definition suggests collection, investigation, and analysis of factual data, why is there a general suppression of facts by environmentalists and the media?  For example: after a record-setting snowy cold winter across Muskoka, Ontario and North America (snow in southern U.S.A.),  where are the headlines about global cooling? Yes, I said it, cooling. Is it illegal for high school students to think and read more inconvenient facts, such as are found at Inconvenientthermometersgeocraft.comsurfacestations.org Johncoleman    (founder of the weather channel) globalwarming truth or hoax?

Science is not concensus, true science is factual. Who cares about the majority? Facts are facts.  I'm sorry if all this is inconvenient.

Albert Grainger,
Port Sydney